|
Decision
Making— Discrepancy
Conclusion
Basis for the conclusion
The
discrepancy conclusion addresses the question, “How does
the child’s performance compare with general education classmates.” At
the end of the annual goal period the student’s growth is compared
to peers or a reasonable standard of performance for same grade peers.
The discrepancy conclusion is different from the progress conclusion.
The progress conclusion is referenced to the individual’s improvement
toward the goal. The discrepancy conclusion compares gains
to a norm or standard. Thus, an individual could meet his or
her goal and yet
be more discrepant from peers than before. The discrepancy
judgment is independent of the progress conclusion and contains
the five following
options.
|
Professional practice in decision making
- Discrepancy determined
at the beginning of the goal period. For
every IEP goal, the IEP team calculates the discrepancy between
the
student and peers, or a standard that relates to peers (developmental
behaviors). This information is appropriately included in
the PLEP statement on the IEP goal page in the section entitled “Baseline.” This
discrepancy represents a gap.
- Discrepancy determined
at the end of the goal period. The
discrepancy is calculated a second time using the same methods
and materials
as were used at the beginning of the goal period.
- Compare the magnitude
of the discrepancy. The discrepancy
at the beginning and end of the goal period are compared
for the purpose
of judging the magnitude of change. Using the same measures
at the beginning and end of the goal period allows the team
to make this
comparison at two points in time.
- When there is
insufficient information to
make a professional judgment, then the “X” is identified
as the conclusion.
Unacceptable practice in decision making
Using two different standards or peer norms at the beginning and
end of the goal period does not allow for a conclusion about the
magnitude of the discrepancy. This is because any change may be due
to the change in measurement rather than a change in the student.
Also, this conclusion can only be made if appropriate data are collected
at two points in time.
|