Research Summary

Decision-Making

 

Pacchiano, D. M. (2000). A Review of Instructional Variables Related to Student Problem Behavior. (Preventing School Failure, 44(4), 174-178.)

Short Summary of Article: Certain teaching strategies maintain students' time spent academically engaged. The authors provide a list of questions to consider when conducting a functional assessment. These questions target instructional variables related to positive student behavior. The questions are broken down into two categories: (1) how teachers teach, and (2) what teachers teach.

"Over the last 20 years, research has demonstrated the relationship between effective instructional practices of teachers and appropriate on-task classroom behavior of students (Carnine, 1976; Anderson, Evertson, & Brophy, 1979; Weeks & Gaylord-Ross, 1981; Brophy & Good, 1985; Gettinger, 1988; McKee & Witt, 1990; Christenson & Ysseldyke, 1989). These investigations found that teachers can prevent problem behaviors from occurring by teaching in ways that promote high levels of academic engagement and by assigning tasks that promote high rates of accurate responses (Christenson & Ysseldyke, 1989; Wehby, Symons, Canale, & Go, 1998). In other words, when teachers implement specific instructional practices effectively and match their tasks to the student's individual needs, classroom instruction becomes a signal to the student, or an antecedent, that something positive is occurring. Under these instructional conditions, students are more likely to remain engaged with the process of learning, to complete academic tasks, and are less likely to engage in off-task and problem behaviors (Martens & Kelly, 1993)." p. 174

INSTRUCTIONAL VARIABLES TO CONSIDER DURING A FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
How Teachers Teach

Effective instructional presentations

Overview--Does the overview inform students of -

1. What they will be learning?

2. How content is organized?

3. How they will be moving through content?

4. How they will be practicing with the information and skills?

 

Sequenced format--Does the format -

1. Break down the objectives into smaller components?

2. Present information in brief periods of instruction?

3. Present components from concrete to increasingly abstract?

4. Explicitly point out how the information relates to previous information?

5. Use multiple types of examples?

6. Ensure redundancy through repetition of examples?

 

Momentum--Is momentum maintained by -

1. Providing advanced organizers?

2. Referencing advanced organizers as presentation proceeds?

3. Managing off-task behavior in non-verbal and non-disruptive ways (e.g., eye contact, circulating through the room, touching on the shoulder, verbal praise)?

 

Teaching how to learn--Does the teacher teach the student how to learn by -

1. Stating aloud the sequence of how to problem solve (e.g., first, second, last) while going through examples?

2. Modeling how to begin, proceed, and know when the task is done?

3. Prompting the student who is confused or unproductive to recite the steps needed to problem solve or begin and finish a task?

 

Interspersed supervised practice--Are practice opportunities characterized by -

1. Being interspersed with brief periods of instruction?

2. The teacher circulating to check progress within the first few minutes of assigning the task?

3. The teacher providing direct feedback to the student individually?

4. The student achieving high rates of accurate responses on practice activities?

 

What Teachers Teach

Monitoring skills and progress --Are monitoring procedures characterized by -

1. The teacher interacting with the student daily to quickly check understanding and progress?

2. The teacher's ability to detail what the student's instructional levels are in reading and math? How the information presented and assignments need to be designed to meet the student's individual needs?

 

Matching to instructional level--Do assignments match the student's instructional level?

1. Can the student successfully complete practice activities and independent seatwork?

2. Can the student complete homework independently or with minimal assistance?

3. Is reading material adapted to the student's instructional reading level when working independently?

 

Choice of tasks--Does the student have choices for -

1. Completing one of two similar assignments?

2. Demonstrating mastery through various outputs (e.g., writing, speaking, role-playing, project)?

3. Where in the room to work?

4. Working in pairs, a group, or sitting with peers, working independently?

5. Completing assignments on the computer, dictating to a peer, or recording responses?

 

 

Full Text
 

 

Questions or comments can be sent to: Sue Dungan

Return to Heartland Home Page

© Heartland AEA 11, 2001